Raw Food vs Processed Food

Dead Foods vs. Living Foods

Can we be dead wrong about our theories on food? Our society is looking for the solution to our weight and health problems. You are looking for a way to live healthily and to have the body of your dreams. Are you not?

Before you look for treasure in a forest, it is a good idea
to make sure that you are in the right forest in the first place. Otherwise,
the search is useless. And you know what? We are in the wrong forest!

That is why nothing is working effectively, we are
struggling and punishing ourselves with torturous diets, and we are getting
into more weight problems and increasing disease.

Have you ever seen an obese wild animal (domesticated
animals don’t count due to human influence)? I bet the answer is never. The only animals that get obese are human beings and domesticated animals (due to human influence). And this became a common problem only after the 1950s. Why is that? We will soon see.

Out of the tens of thousands of species on of animals,
birds, plants, marine life, and all other life, we are the only species that
have degenerative disease as a primary cause of death. We are also the only
species that have obesity problems. No other creature on this planet has
obesity problems.

Yet we are the only species with doctors, scientists,
experts, and all that other sort of thing. At any one time, 65% of women in the
UK are on diet. Obesity now affects almost 60% of Americans. We have more
diets, diet book, and diet foods than ever before. So why is it getting worse?
If these diets and so on worked, the problem would be reducing, not increasing.
The reason lies in the nature, not quantity, of the foods we eat, compared to
the nature of the foods pre-1950. Consider the following research.

Meso health means middle nourishment. Meso health is a
condition that was discovered just before World War II by Professor Werner
Kollath. He raised animals on a diet of processed foods that had been made
empty of all minerals and vitamins except for thiamine, potassium sulfate, and
zinc. Even though the animals were raised on a completely depleted diet, the
animals grew up and initially showed no signs of disease of deficiency (by the
way, we only get 10% of our energy from food, the remaining 90% is from air).
However, when they reached adulthood they started to show degenerative signs
similar to the ones that you find in humans in the Western world. The animal
started developing intestinal toxemia, lost calcium from their bones and had a
condition just like the human osteoporosis, they started getting dental
carries, started having damaged organs similar to the damage you find in humans
in the Western world, and so on. When the professor gave vitamin supplements
to these animals to see whether these supplements would reverse the changes,
nothing happened. The only thing that was able to reverse all these changes
was introduction of fresh living raw food that was composed of plenty of
vegetables. This research has been confirmed many times over by scientists all
over the world.

Perhaps the best illustration of this is the Pottenger cat
study, an amazing yet simple experiment run over 10 years. It has since been
repeated using different test subjects, all with the same results.

This study demonstrates clearly that the consumption of some of the kind of foods encouraged on Western diets leads to quiet, long-term
degeneration of body parts, reproductive ability, and so on, and later
manifests itself as degenerative diseases and, surprise, obesity due to toxicity
when systems start to fail. The problem with these kinds of foods comes in on a
level previously unconsidered by most people.

The Pottenger cat study was done by Dr. Francis Pottenger
between 1932 and 1942 using about 900 cats. The study itself was conducted
together with Dr. Alvin Foord who was a professor of pathology at the
University of Southern California. It was a study that was done under very
specific scientific conditions with a very actuate record keeping, observation,
and statistical analysis. In fact, all the 600 cats had complete medical
histories even before the experiment began.

The cats were divided into two groups. There was a control
group that was given a raw food diet that was composed of raw meat, milk, and
cod liver oil. Then there was the other group given a diet that was composed
of cooked meat and milk plus the cod liver oil. The following is what happened
over several generations of cats.

The control group that was given a raw diet remained healthy
and gave birth to healthy cats in the first generation. The cats that were
given the cooked foods also give birth to healthy appearing cats in the first
generation. In the second generation, the cats started to have even more
noticeable differences. Within the first two generations, it is not readily
apparent what the damaged of the cooked foods is. However, the most observable
effect (and the most amazing one) happened to the fourth generation cats. For
the cats that were eating raw foods, their fourth generation kittens were just
fine. Just like any other normal healthy cats. However, the group of cats
that were eating cooked foods could not produce the fourth generation of cats.
In other words, there was no fourth generation cats available to study for the
cooked foods cats. All cats of the third generation that had grown up on the
cooked diets could not give birth to any offspring that was healthy. Some did
not give birth, and those that did only gave birth to kittens that lived for
less than six months. Now remember that in both groups the food quantity was
kept the same. Both the cats that ate the cooked foods and the ones that ate
the raw foods ate the same amount of food. The only difference was that one
group was given cooked foods and the other was not. And the only foods these
cats were given were strictly meat, milk, and cod liver oil. Nothing extra was
given to any of the cats.

Okay, let us see what other changes they discovered in these
cats. The cats eating raw foods grew up to be of uniform size and development
and their fur, tissues, and skeleton were perfect as normal. The amount of
calcium and phosphorous in their bones was also all right. Their organs grew
well as normal. Their nervous system was working well and their coordination
was perfect. They were very resistant to infections. All their offspring were
fine. Their mental state was very stable and friendly. And you could play
with them. There was also no birth complication and nursing and giving birth
was just normal. The cats gave birth to an average of five kittens each one
weighing roughly 119 grams.

However, the cats that were eating cooked meat and milk
increasingly, with each new generation, gave birth to other cats that had
abnormal variations in their skeletal structure. Their bones became soft and
brittle by the time they reached the third generation. And from the very first
generation onwards, the following problems were noticed with all the cats that
were eating cooked foods: poor eyesight, heart problems, thyroid and bladder problems,
nervous system problems, meningitis and paralysis, infections of various
organs, ovary and testis problems, liver problems, bone problems,
nearsightedness or farsightedness, inflammations, uterine congestion, atrophy
of various organs, failure of reproductive systems, and so on. The cats eating
cooked foods also aborted about 25% of the offspring in the first generation,
about 70% of the offspring in the second generation, and in all cases the
delivery was difficult and sometimes the females died giving birth. The
kittens that were born of mothers that were eating cooked foods were born about
19 grams less than the ones that were born from cats eating raw foods. Their
skins also started to go bad, showing parasites, lesions, and allergies. With each
generation, these problems became even worse.

By the third generation, the cats’ bones from the group that
ate the cooked foods had actually become rubber-like. Their mental status was
also not normal anymore. With each new generation, the cats became more
unpredictable, were more irritable, were biting and scratching more, were less
playful, and so on. The males also became very docile and experienced a drop
in their libido and sexual interest while the females became very aggressive.
There was also a huge increase in same sex sexual activity.

The cats were then returned to the normal raw food diet and
taken off the cooked foods diet to see what would happen. It took about four
generations of cats eating a normal healthy diet for the first cats to be born
that was absolutely normal. So this is what we know from this experiment. The
cats were given cooked foods for four generations to see what would happen.
But by the third generation it was impossible to get a fourth generation.
These cats were then given their normal raw food to see what happens and it
took about four generations to go back to complete normalcy.

We’re not sure how many generations it takes for the human
species to go to complete chaos like the cats did, but we can already see signs
of it. Each new human generation being born today has even more complications
and health issues at younger ages than previous ones. We now see children
getting diseases that were previously only seen in older people. But let us go
back to looking at the cats again. What the scientists found out was that
different parts of the cats’ body systems took different amounts of time to go
back to normal. Some systems took one generation; some took two generations
and so on. But generally, for these cats, it took about four generations for
everything to go back to normal.

Here are some more findings from this experiment. The
experiment was repeated again but this time instead of the cats receiving
cooked meat, they received one-third of the diet in raw meat plus two-thirds of
their diet in pasteurized, sweetened condensed or corporate milk. So the only
change this time was to make the milk processed in some way. Once again, the
results were pretty much the same. Even though the meat was raw this time, the
presence of processed milk still resulted in problems. The other thing that
they noticed was that once the female cats was given about 12 to 18 months of a
diet that was composed of cooked foods, they were never again able to give
birth to normal kittens and all her kittens would be defective in some way or
the other.

A similar experiment was done using rats. The rats were
studied by a completely different set of scientists. To summarize, there were
two groups of rats. One group was raised on whole wheat that was healthy and
organic, and another group was raised on commercial white flour, the kind that
you find in the supermarket. The rats that were raised on white flour ended up
under-sized, unable to reproduce, aggressive and hostile, and with many reports
of tooth decay. The rats that were raised on whole wheat had no problems.

Another study that was done that is similar to these was one
that was done using pigs. Again, one group of pigs was given a diet that was
processed. And once again, they had health problems and deformed offspring.
However, with pigs it only took one generation of healthy eating for the
offspring to be born normal again.

So as you can see, it appears that different animals, eating different foods, have different rates of getting sick and getting well due to the introduction of processed foods, but all of them degenerated because of cooked foods. That is the one constant, the degeneration of the body, the mind and emotions with introduction of a large percentage of processed and cooked foods. There is much more to this than can be said in a short article, but it begins to paint a clear picture.

Since the 1950s, we have been following some very incorrect
and unnatural guidelines regarding food, weight, and its link to health. Ever
since then, we have become the only species on earth to have obesity problems
and die of degenerative diseases. Paradoxically, we are also the only species
that counts calories, is perpetually on a diet, and just can’t seem to get lean
and healthy. Why is that so? And why did it only start in the 1950s? Recently,
the answers have been coming through and the truth is progressively being
exposed. Have you ever asked yourself, “What if everything I know about food is wrong?” What would that mean to your life and your efforts?


Article written by

David Cameron, CEO ImagesOfOne.com,
author of Diet Liberation: What If Everything You Knew About Food, Health,
Weight, Body Shape, Disease And Ageing Was Wrong, A Happy Pocket Full of Money,
and more. He is also the developer of the Prova LifeDiet Liberator, LifeGoals
Effortless Achiever+, and LifeMap Numerology software packages. Download your
free 78-page sampler of the Diet Liberation book at ImagesOfOne.com

Incoming search terms:

  • raw vs processed foods
  • raw food vs processed food
  • pure vs processed foods
  • processed raw food
  • processed food vs raw food
  • raw foods vs processed food
  • what are processed raw foods
  • raw vs processed
  • raw vs processed areas
  • study done on animals eating processed foods verse raw food
Share
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>